When
describing someone using people-first language, one puts the person
before the trait. Thus we say “person with a disability,” rather than
“disabled person.” (The word “handicapped” is antiquated and offensive
to most people; it derives from 1800s England when people with
disabilities would beg in the streets with their “cap in hand.”)
Language
is always evolving. The words we choose and use can, and do, affect
societal and media attitudes. Even well-meaning people who don’t believe
they are prejudiced can subtly send a negative message with the
language they use.
For
example, if someone were to say, “I never think of you as disabled,”
the underlying meaning is, “You don’t seem disabled… so long as you
continue to do well,” or “You do a good job fitting in with us,” or “you
hide it well.” Why is this stigmatizing, or perpetuating a negative
attitude? Because the implication is that a person with a disability is
different than “the rest of us” and should work to fit in or hide their
disability.
Avoid
using words like “victim” or “sufferer”; it presumes the person is in
agony or perpetually helpless. Rather, choose words like “stroke
survivor” or “person with MS.”
There are other neutral terms to use as well.